Dr Rateb Jneid, President of AFIC said: “We reject trial by speculation"
 
Dr RIFI: “It seemed “people think Australian Muslims were immune to mental health disorders”.
 
Australian Muslim Community Calls for Transparency and Accountability of Law Enforcement Action
 
HONORING THE ENEMY
 
Lebanese Interior Minister: We will intensify patrols on the airport road
 
A mass grave was uncovered in the Nasser complex...
 
An emergency Arab meeting in Cairo to discuss Israel's threats to invade Rafah
 
The Turkish President rules out Hamas leaving Qatar
 
If it reaches Earth, a disaster will occur
 
Award-winning crime writers headline Sydney Writers’ Festival
 
Al-Sadiq: We discussed with the director of the World Bank in the M E about supporting Lebanon
 
Is Ukraine involved in the Sudan war as Russia does?
 
60 Minutes: Tara Brown's comments were wrong and she should count herself lucky





Emotional Tara Brown explains her perspective on 60 Minutes after being released from a Beirut jail following the botched child recovery story. Photo: Channel Nine

60 Minutes: Tara Brown's comments were wrong and she should count herself lucky

60 Minutes: Tara Brown's comments were wrong and she should count herself lucky

Michael Lallo

Entertainment reporter

(Translation of this article appears in Arabic section)

On Sunday night's episode of 60 Minutes, she defended her involvement in the failed "recovery" of Sally Faulkner's two children from Lebanon.

Her comments were tone deaf.

Instead of a mea culpa, she offered a defence. Worse, she implied the Lebanese authorities treated the 60 Minutes team unfairly.

"I thought, 'We're journalists, we're doing our job – and they will see reason, they will understand that'," Brown told colleague Michael Usher.

"We are here just to do a story on a very desperate mother, and I thought that reason would prevail – and it didn't."

Instead of complaining, Brown should count herself lucky.

Image result for 60 Minutes: Tara Brown's comments were wrong and she should count herself lucky

Michael Usher greets colleague Tara Brown at the beginning of a

60 Minutes interview. Photo: Channel Nine

She, her three colleagues and Faulkner are back home, while the two child recovery agents are still in detention.

It might have been so much worse.

The TV crew could have been convicted of kidnapping, then left to rot in a Beirut prison.

Faulkner's estranged mother-in-law could have been more seriously hurt while being manhandled during the raid.

Ali Elamine, Faulkner's soon-to-be ex-husband, was supposedly tipped off about her arrival in Lebanon. Apparently, he knew of her intention to bring their children back to Australia. What if he had assigned armed bodyguards to the children?

Not to mention that in Lebanon, it is illegal to go around snatching kids from bus stops. In their culture, they call it "kidnapping". It's a strange custom they observe.

Whether or not Sally Faulkner had full custody – under Australian law – is not the point.

It's perfectly legitimate for 60 Minutes to report on the growing problem of international custody disputes. To use Faulkner as a case study. To focus on her (entirely understandable) anguish.

This does not mean that anything goes.

Image result for 60 Minutes: Tara Brown's comments were wrong and she should count herself lucky

60 Minutes television presenter Tara Brown and producer

Stephen Rice arrive at Sydney International Airport

on Thursday. Photo: Daniel Munoz

Last week, Fairfax Media revealed Channel Nine transferred almost $70,000 to the firm used to retrieve Faulkner's children.

Whether Nine wired the money "accidentally" – thinking it was Faulkner's account – it does appear that someone got paid.

If Nine's money funded the operation, directly or indirectly, Brown's argument doesn't hold water.

She can't claim the 60 Minutes crew were just journalists "doing our job". They crossed the line from observers to participants. Very active participants.

Their goal was not only to re-unite a mother with her children. They wanted dramatic footage of a raid, to boost their ratings. To be the heroes of their own story.

Of course, journalists often influence the things they report on. Merely asking a question can change the outcome. If I probe a TV network about a bullied staffer, for instance, their manager might get fired.

Image result for 60 Minutes: Tara Brown's comments were wrong and she should count herself lucky

Sally Faulkner, who has returned to Australia without the two

children she tried to retrieve from Lebanon, seen here with

 estranged husband Ali Elamine.

Journalists can also break laws without doing anything ethically wrong. The ABC's Linton Besser and Louie Eroglu were detained, then thrown out of Malaysia, after trying to question the Prime Minister about a corruption scandal.

To draw comparisons between this, and the 60 Minutes crew, is mischievous.

The Malaysian authorities used their laws to intimidate reporters asking legitimate questions.

The Lebanese authorities used their laws to detain foreigners who barged in and grabbed two children off the street. What, exactly, is unreasonable about that?

The Lebanese police could have opened fire. An armed civilian might have tried to save the day. The children themselves could been hurt – or killed.

As I've said before, Ms Faulkner's distress is understandable. Did she exhaust every other option, though, before going down this path? And would 60 Minutes have paid her a large sum just for an interview? Or did they want her to spend her fee on a "child recovery" operation?

The 60 Minutes crew might scoff at all this. But if their plan was so great, how did they all wind up in jail, in the centre of a global media storm – and a major international diplomatic incident?

Tara Brown is a Walkley Award winner. I've commended her previously as a superb reporter and tough interviewer.

She should have known better.

On Sunday night, at the start of the program, Usher said: "There's one thing we want to state very clearly from the outset. We made mistakes."

He did not spell out those mistakes, explaining that an internal review was under way.

It would be wise for Nine to recognise that the public is not actually divided over this scandal.

Most, it seems, are simply appalled by the actions of 60 Minutes.

Twitter: @Michael_Lallo


 














Copyright 2007 mideast-times.com