Joe Biden’s not-quite-as-bad-as-it-could-have-been press conference fixes nothing
Samuel Clench
12/07/2024
(See translation in Arabic section)
Sydney - Middle East Times Int’l:That’s the go-to word these days, whenever Joe Biden’s train of thought derails mid-sentence.
“I’ve been thinking about the state of our marriage. I really don’t think it’s fair that you … anyway. Bolognese for dinner, is it?”
“Can you believe what’s happening at the Jets? That quarterback of theirs is … anyway. The 1940s were a hell of a time.”
That sort of thing. Sometimes the derailment is mild, more of a quick breakdown really, and we’re moving forward along the same track again after a minute or two. And sometimes the thought has plummeted off a cliff to be gone for good, lost in a burning heap of wreckage.
It’s not the mixing up of names that makes Mr Biden so excruciating to watch in this undignified twilight of his political career. Donald Trump often forgets which city he’s in. A few months back he spent an entire speech confusing former House speaker Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat, with his top opponent for the Republican nomination, Nikki Haley.
That’s standard, harmless old guy stuff. The moment when Mr Biden called Volodymyr Zelensky “President Putin” on Thursday was embarrassing, and funny, but has no lasting effect on America’s policy stance towards Ukraine and Russia.
The US President’s inability to form coherent sentences, though? The fact that people have stopped bothering to parse the substance of his remarks, and are instead tuning in merely to cringe through his next gaffe? That matters.
The leader of the free world, as Americans so dearly love to call their president, is no longer being taken seriously. He’s a walking punchline. That matters.
There are two pesky questions here. One: is Mr Biden capable of doing the job for another four-and-a-half years? Two: is he capable of beating Mr Trump in November’s election? The first is more important, the second will determine what happens next, and the answer to both is straying dangerously close to a firm, irrevocable no.
“I’ve just got to pace myself a little more,” Mr Biden said during his NATO summit press conference, before tacking on a complaint that his staff, the sheer cheek of them, add events to his schedule “all the time”. As though having a full schedule as President of the United States is an unreasonable imposition.
I get to whine when someone adds a work meeting to my calendar at 5pm on a Friday. How important could a discussion about SEO strategy possibly be? Substitute that for a meeting of the White House National Security Council, and, you know what, I think I’d tolerate it.
When Mr Trump was president, he famously spent most mornings lazing around in the presidential residence, watching television, posting malicious tweets and avoiding anything that resembled serious work. Now we have a guy who can barely make it past 8pm unless he sets aside some time for a nap.
So as things stand, perhaps the most consequential US presidential election of our lifetime is boiling down to a choice between one intellectually spent old man you would barely consider hiring to run a small business, and another chronically delusional old man you wouldn’t trust to babysit his own grandchildren. I’ll let you decide which is which.
Put it this way: the American presidency ages almost everyone. Quite horrendously. Compare photos of George W. Bush in 2000, or Barack Obama in 2008, to those of the same men after eight years of ungodly stress, sleepless nights and presumably bone-chilling intelligence reports.
Joe Biden was already ancient when he took the job, which goes some distance towards explaining why he’s such an old, old 81 now. Meanwhile, Mr Trump’s four years in the White House barely aged him at all, which betrays a frankly unsettling indifference towards his responsibilities.
Who is worse? A president who feels the full weight of his duties, but is too mentally infirm to bear them competently? Or a president who is a little, teensy bit sharper, but doesn’t give a damn about anyone other than himself?
Maybe, perhaps, possibly, with just a skerrick of self-awareness, either or both of these men would ponder stepping aside. Oh, we ask so much of them.
That Mr Biden, in his condition, has convinced himself there is no better person to be president is … well, anyway. Imagine a world in which Michael Jordan, in 2024, was still clinging on to the shooting guard position at the Bulls. It’s preposterous.
If Mr Biden were 10 points ahead of Mr Trump in the polls, he could probably get away with hiding from the public until the election. But he’s behind, and will remain so unless something dramatic changes the dynamic.
How is he supposed to deliver such a monumental change, given the absolute state of him? He needs to be out and about, making his case, holding press conferences, doing long, tough interviews, prosecuting the argument.
But he can’t. He can’t be trusted to participate in anything other than the most tightly scripted events, lest he suffer another catastrophic senior moment.
It is so very obviously untenable. Vice President Kamala Harris, for all her flaws as a politician – and there are many – can at least speak somewhat reliably. And if she were to become the Democratic candidate, the American voter would have an alternative to the self-absorbed gerontocracy currently monopolising their politics.
Or we can just continue as we are, hoping no world events arise requiring the input of a cogent, competent American president. That’s a wonderful plan.

Leading House Democrat now goes public with calls for Biden to step aside
Story by James Liddell
11/07/2024
(See translation in Arabic section)
Sydney - Middle East Times Int’l: Representative Adam Smith has become the sixth House Democrat to call for Biden to drop out of the 2024 presidential race since last month’s election debate disaster– as the president continues to dig in.
The Washington lawmaker was reportedly among several committee ranking members who privately told House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries that Biden should bow out in a “brutal” two-hour call on Sunday.
The list – previously naming Smith – includes Jerrold Nadler, Mark Takano, Joseph Morelle, Susan Wild, and Jim Himes, three sources told CNN.
Now, Smith, 59, has decided to go public, declaring that he thinks Biden “should step aside”, adding that the White House’s “be quiet, fall in line” message isn’t working.
“I think it’s become clear that he’s not the best person to carry the Democratic message, he told CNN’s Jake Tapper in an interview on Monday.
“Here’s the thing, we have an incredibly strong message … the president has shown he is not capable of delivering that message,” Smith added.
Biden’s painful performance on the debate stage against Donald Trump on June 27, which at points saw him struggle to deliver a coherent response to his Republican rival, was a nail-in-the-coffin moment, Smith said.
However, the senior Democrat said that “there were concerns leading up to” the event about Biden’s ability to land a message, adding that it “hasn’t gotten better since then”.
While he didn’t explicitly address rumors surrounding the 81-year-old president’s cognitive decline that stemmed from the debate, Smith admitted that “there are the healthcare concerns”.
The damning call for Biden’s resignation landed just hours after he voiced his frustrations with “elites in the party” on MSNBC’s episode of Morning Joe. He goaded dissenting Democrats to run against him and “challenge me at the convention”, in August.
It comes after five House Democrats have publicly called for Biden to step down for his re-election bid including Texas’ Lloyd Doggett, Arizona’s Raul Grijalva, Massachusetts’ Seth Moulton, Illinois’ Mike Quigley and Minnesota’s Angie Craig.
Biden continues to fight for his political survival as he maintains that he will both run against – and beat – Trump when the electorate hits the polls in November.
Congressional Democrats received a two-page letter from the president on Monday as he tried to quell the uprising among senior party members.
Sharing on his Twitter/X account, Biden declared that he is “firmly committed to staying in this race, to running this race to the end, and to beating Donald Trump”.
The president will hope that this week’s Nato summit will offer a reprieve and allow him to move forward with his campaign.
Independent readers are independently-minded global citizens. They are not defined by traditional demographics or profiles, but by their attitudes. In today’s increasingly fragmented world, communities value real facts and frank opinions delivered first-hand from a non-biased news brand that they can trust. Armed with information and inspiration, Independent readers are empowered and equipped to take a stand for the things they believe in.
“To all those who spread misinformation that the amount of $8 billion that was verified by the “Kroll” company and which entered the advisory account at the “Optimum” company, are restrictions that occurred in the context of financial engineering to cover the losses of the Central Bank. Okay, assuming this matter is true, Why all this secrecy on the part of the BDL, and why it does not disclose the content of the account and its restrictions, how these commissions were spent, and where they went in the face of the theft of the era, and in the face of the impoverishment of the Lebanese people, stripping them of their savings, and the collapse of the economy? Don’t the Lebanese have the right to know every detail of this account? What is required is transparency, what is required is not to cover up any waste, what is required is the truth, in the form of His Excellency the Ruler.”